Friday, February 27, 2009

'Defense Chief Lifts Ban on Pictures of Coffins'

'In a reversal of an 18-year-old military policy that critics said was hiding the ultimate cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the news media will now be allowed to photograph the coffins of America’s war dead as their bodies are returned to the United States, but only if the families of the dead agree.

The decision, which Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced Thursday, lifts a 1991 blanket ban on such photographs put in place under President George Bush.

The original 1991 ban had its genesis in an embarrassment for the first President Bush.

In 1989, the television networks showed split-screen images of Mr. Bush sparring and joking with reporters on one side and a military honor guard unloading coffins from a military action that he had ordered in Panama on the other'

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/washington/27coffins.html?th&emc=th

Obama to Ban Sale of Assault Weapons

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6960824&page=1

'The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons." ' - Eric Holder, 2/25/09

Sunday, February 22, 2009

"A Lean War Machine" - Fixing the US Military

In 2008 alone, the US spent around $700 billion on the military, $500 billion for the Pentagon and ~$200 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan. That is twice as much as the next five largest militaries in the world spent combined.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21owens.html?ex=1387515600&en=691aa4520ea30b96&ei=5124&partner=facebook&exprod=facebook

'The claim that continuing extraordinary military expenditures are good for the economy is false. There are much better Main Street investments to end the recession around (public works and education, to name a couple). There is no need to keep military spending level — the money is going largely to maintain a military that is increasingly less effective in meeting future security challenges, and hundreds of millions of dollars are squandered because of inefficiency, poor budgeting and greed.

The saddest thing about this is that the Pentagon tends to make cuts by trying to stretch and shave existing programs. What President Dwight D. Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” is resurgent, this time driven by defense contractors. Their myopic drive to assure quarterly profits stifles innovation. And little changes because they wield inordinate influence through contracts in nearly every Congressional district.

There is a better way, one that turns the necessity of cost reductions into a military more suited to the national security challenges we will face down the road. We need to realize the principles of what military planners called the “revolution of military affairs” of the mid-1990s. To do so calls for innovations in three areas: first, a joint-service perspective that emphasizes the interdependence of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; second, investment that focuses on cutting-edge information technology systems that allow our forces to work together more effectively, rather than more spending on the complex and expensive major weapons systems of the past; and last, changes in the way the Pentagon goes about assessing its needs and contracting.

“Jointness” can reduce redundancies: by acting separately, the services needlessly duplicate one another’s efforts in logistics, communications, intelligence, medical services and administration — not to mention several areas of war-fighting. Because each service operates its bases independently, we have far too many. Consolidating them into “megabases” would make for greater effectiveness and save tens of billions. Likewise, an emphasis on information technology can increase the strength of the force while it reduces the need for manpower, the single most expensive aspect of today’s military.'

Biodiesel Made From Coffee Grounds

'Mano Misra, a professor of engineering [at the University of Nevada] who conducted the research with Narasimharao Kondamudi and Susanta K. Mohapatra, said it was by accident that he realized coffee beans contained a significant amount of oil. “I made a coffee one night but forgot to drink it,” he said. “The next morning I saw a layer of oil floating on it.” He and his team thought there might be a useful amount of oil in used grounds, so they went to several Starbucks stores and picked up about 50 pounds of them.

Analysis showed that even the grounds contained about 10 to 15 percent oil by weight. The researchers then used standard chemistry techniques to extract the oil and convert it to biodiesel. The processes are not particularly energy intensive, Dr. Misra said, and the researchers estimated that biodiesel could be produced for about a dollar a gallon.

One hurdle, Dr. Misra said, is in collecting grounds efficiently — there are few centralized sources of coffee grounds. But the researchers plan to set up a small pilot operation next year using waste from a local bulk roaster.

Even if all the coffee grounds in the world were used to make fuel, the amount produced would be less than 1 percent of the diesel used in the United States annually. “It won’t solve the world’s energy problem,” Dr. Misra said of his work. “But our objective is to take waste material and convert it to fuel.” '

Some Good ol' Pundit Pwnage

Rising Meat Consumption = Faster Global Warming


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/science/earth/04meat.html

The Problem:

'The trillions of farm animals around the world generate 18 percent of the emissions that are raising global temperatures, according to United Nations estimates, more even than from cars, buses and airplanes.

Producing a pound of beef creates 11 times as much greenhouse gas emission as a pound of chicken and 100 times more than a pound of carrots, according to Lantmannen, the Swedish group.

Estimates of emissions from agriculture as a percentage of all emissions vary widely from country to country, but they are clearly over 50 percent in big agricultural and meat-producing countries like Brazil, Australia and New Zealand.'

Possible Solutions:

'At the electricity-from-manure project here in Sterksel [Netherlands], the refuse from thousands of pigs is combined with local waste materials (outdated carrot juice and crumbs from a cookie factory), and pumped into warmed tanks called digesters. There, resident bacteria release the natural gas within, which is burned to generate heat and electricity.

The farm uses 25 percent of the electricity, and the rest is sold to a local power provider. The leftover mineral slurry is an ideal fertilizer that reduces the use of chemical fertilizers, whose production releases a heavy dose of carbon dioxide.

For this farm the scheme has provided a substantial payback: By reducing its emissions, it has been able to sell carbon credits on European markets. It makes money by selling electricity. It gets free fertilizer.

And, in a small country where farmers are required to have manure trucked away, it saves $190,000 annually in disposal fees.

Rising in the fields of the environmentally conscious Netherlands, the Sterksel project is a rare example of fledgling efforts to mitigate the heavy emissions from livestock. But much more needs to be done, scientists say, as more and more people are eating more meat around the world.

High-tech fixes include those like the project here, called “methane capture,” as well as inventing feed that will make cows belch less methane, which traps heat with 25 times the efficiency of carbon dioxide.

Other proposals include everything from persuading consumers to eat less meat to slapping a “sin tax” on pork and beef. Next year, Sweden will start labeling food products so that shoppers can look at how much emission can be attributed to serving steak compared with, say, chicken or turkey.'

In Denmark, by law, farmers now inject manure under the soil instead of laying it on top of the fields, a process that enhances its fertilizing effect, reduces odors and also prevents emissions from escaping. By contrast, in many parts of the developing world, manure is left in open pools and lathered on fields.

Others suggest including agriculture emissions in carbon cap-and-trade systems, which currently focus on heavy industries like cement making and power generation. Farms that produce more than their pre-set limit of emissions would have to buy permits from greener colleagues to pollute.

The best short term solution, however, is to simply reduce our meat consumption. However, "whether you like it or not, there’s going to be rising demand for meat, and our job is to make it as sustainable as possible,”says Laurence Wrixon, executive director of the International Meat Secretariat.

Producing Genius - Nature or Nurture?


http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1879593,00.html

What is genius? It is 'those who "have the intelligence, enthusiasm, and endurance to acquire the needed expertise in a broadly valued domain of achievement" and who then make contributions to that field that are considered by peers to be both "original and highly exemplary." '

How can we quantify genius? Possible methods are to '...add up the number of times an individual's publications are cited in professional literature — or, say, the number of times a composer's work is performed and recorded.' Or 'count encyclopedia references instead. Such methods may not be terribly sophisticated, but the answer they yield is at least a hard quantity.'

And then there is the old 10 year rule, 'the notion that it takes at least 10 years (or 10,000 hours) of dedicated practice for people to master most complex endeavors.' This concept was suggested early as 1899 but Anders Ercisson, a professor of psychology from Florida State University, has conducted numerous studies proving the 10 year rule.

While this article leans more towards the nurture side of the debate, it is important to remember that "you need to be smart enough for practice to teach you something."

235 MPG car - thanks VW!


http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/07/laugh-at-high-g.html

"Low weight only gets you so far in the quest for ultimate fuel economy; aerodynamics plays a big role. The One-Liter is long and low, coming in at 11.4 feet long, 4.1 feet wide and 3.3 feet tall. It features an aircraft-like canopy, flat wheel covers and a belly pan to smooth the airflow under the car. The engine cooling vents open only when needed, and video cameras take the place of mirrors. The passenger sits behind the driver to keep the car narrow."

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Micronutrients Are Where It's At

Kristof - Raising the World’s I.Q.

'Almost one-third of the world’s people don’t get enough iodine from food and water. The result in extreme cases is large goiters that swell their necks, or other obvious impairments such as dwarfism or cretinism. But far more common is mental slowness.

When a pregnant woman doesn’t have enough iodine in her body, her child may suffer irreversible brain damage and could have an I.Q. that is 10 to 15 points lower than it would otherwise be. An educated guess is that iodine deficiency results in a needless loss of more than 1 billion I.Q. points around the world.

Development geeks rave about the benefits of adding iodine and other micronutrients (such as vitamin A, iron, zinc and folic acid) to diets. The Copenhagen Consensus, which brings together a panel of top global economists to find the most cost-effective solutions to the world’s problems, puts micronutrients at the top of the list of foreign aid spending priorities.

“Probably no other technology,” the World Bank said of micronutrients, “offers as large an opportunity to improve lives ... at such low cost and in such a short time." '

Green Jobs Galore

A Splash of Green for the Rust Belt

'The market is potentially enormous. In a report last year, the Energy Department concluded that the United States could make wind energy the source of one-fifth of its electricity by 2030, up from about 2 percent today. That would require nearly $500 billion in new construction and add more than three million jobs, the report said. Much of the growth would be around the Great Lakes, the hardest-hit region in a country that has lost four million manufacturing jobs over the last decade.

Throw in solar energy along with generating power from crops, and the continued embrace of renewable energy would create as many as five million jobs by 2030.'

Powerful Haiti Photos


photos by Tyler Hicks.

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/04/18/world/0418-HAITI_index.html

Anderson Cooper is a Funny Man

LOL - "active life outdoor challenge" video game


http://www.amazon.com/Active-Life-Outdoor-Challenge-Nintendo-Wii/dp/B0013LTP5Q
"NYT - Volunteer to Save the Economy"

Bruce Reed and John Bridgeland, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush's domestic policy advisers, respectively, have a great idea to create 250,000 jobs for $8 billion; focus on non-profits.

'The nonprofit plunge also seriously endangers the nation’s job market. Nonprofit enterprises have 9.4 million employees and 4.7 million volunteers nationwide — together, that’s 10 percent of the American work force, more than the auto and financial industries combined. Yet nonprofit groups have been almost completely overlooked during the economic debate. That’s a mistake.

There is, however, a bipartisan solution ready to go: during the campaign, both Mr. Obama and Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee, endorsed the Serve America Act, which would greatly expand national and community service.

By including key provisions of that bill in the economic recovery package, Congress and the administration would enable 250,000 Americans to do full-time service over the next two years. We can invest in a new generation of volunteers as well: if federal work-study programs were doubled, over half a million part-time opportunities a year would be created for college students. All this could be done through existing nonprofit groups, charities and faith-based organizations, not a new government bureaucracy.

The total two-year cost? Less than $8 billion — adding not even 1 percent to a $825 billion recovery package.'

"Suck on that MLK"

Utilities Utilize Competition to Lower Energy Use






'Robert Cialdini, a social psychologist at Arizona State University, studies how to get Americans — even those who did not care about the environment — to lower energy consumption. And while there are many ways, Dr. Cialdini said, few are as effective as comparing people with their peers.

At Central College in Pella, Iowa, students in a new green dorm can go to the school’s Web site to find out how much power their suite is using and compare it with that of other suites."

In Massachusetts, the BrainShift Foundation, a nonprofit that uses games to raise environmental awareness, recruited towns to compete in a reality series, called “Energy Smackdown,” which is shown on a local cable station.

Up to 66% reductions in consumption have been seen as a result.

“As Americans, we are good at entertainment and competition. It’s why on ‘American Idol’ they get 40 million voters. It’s the part of this culture that people really understand, and we should be harnessing it." '

The Iraq War is the Largest Spending Bill Ever



the iraq war, not the stimulus bill, is the largest spending project ever.

woot woot barney frank.

Global Warming Worse Than Predicted

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE51D29E20090214?rpc=60

"We are basically looking now at a future climate that is beyond anything that we've considered seriously," Chris Field, a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, told the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Chicago.

"Recent climate studies suggested the continued warming of the planet from greenhouse gas emissions could touch off large, destructive wildfires in tropical rain forests and melt permafrost in the Arctic tundra, releasing billions of tons of greenhouse gasses that could raise global temperatures even more."

Rape in the Congo

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/21/opinion/21herbert.html

'Women and girls of all ages, from old women to very young children, have been gang-raped, and in many cases their sexual organs have been mutilated. The victims number in the hundreds of thousands. But the world, for the most part, has remained indifferent to their suffering.“These women are raped in front of their husbands, in front of their children, in front of their parents, in front of their neighbors,” said Dr. Denis Mukwege, a gynecologist who runs a hospital in Bukavu.

In some cases, the rapists have violated their victims with loaded guns and pulled the triggers. Other women have had their organs deliberately destroyed by knives or other weapons. Sons have been forced at gunpoint to rape their mothers. Many women and girls have been abducted and sexually enslaved.It is as if, in these particular instances, some window to what we think of as our common humanity had been closed.

[An eight year old girl's] father had been killed in an attack, her mother was raped, and the girl herself was abducted. The child was raped by groups of soldiers over a two-week period and then abandoned.

The girl felt too ashamed to allow herself to be held, Ms. Ensler said, because her injuries had left her incontinent. After explaining how she persuaded the child to accept an embrace, to be hugged, Ms. Ensler said, “If we’re living in a century when an 8-year-old girl is incontinent because that many soldiers have raped her, then something has gone terribly wrong.”

Despite the presence in the region of the largest U.N. peacekeeping mission in the world, no one has been able to stop the systematic rape of the Congolese women.'

many organizations are working to help the situation but several I can mention off the bat are;

The ENOUGH project

The International Crisis Group

STAND

Sunday, February 15, 2009

California Court Ruling Highlights Over-Crowded Prisons

California's Crowded Prisons - NYT

"California’s 33 prisons were designed to house 84,000 inmates; they now hold more than 150,000.

The court found that California was violating the prisoners’ Eighth Amendment rights — which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment — and it ordered the state to reduce the inmate population to levels closer to the system’s intended capacity.
The court concluded that this could be done through a variety of means without endangering public safety.A large number of California prisoners are behind bars for technical parole violations. Others are in for minor, nonviolent crimes. Inmates like those can and should be released, and given help to reintegrate into society.

There are now 2.3 million people behind bars nationwide — many for nonviolent crimes.

This country needs to be a lot smarter about who it puts in prison in the first place, and who would be better off in drug-treatment programs and other nonprison environments. It has to do a better job of educating prisoners and giving them jobs skills. And it needs to devote more energy and money to prisoner re-entry, the critical moment when prisoners are released and need help getting jobs, housing and onto the right path."

Another article provides more information:

The court has ordered that California reduce its prison population by 1/3 within three years (so from ~150,000 --> ~100,000). Note that 100,000 is still overcapacity (33 prisons with a total capacity for 84,000).

"
The California attorney general, Jerry Brown, vowed to appeal the ruling.

“This order, the latest intrusion by the federal judiciary into California’s prison system, is a blunt instrument that does not recognize the imperatives of public safety, nor the challenges of incarcerating criminals, many of whom are deeply disturbed,” Mr. Brown said in a statement.

“The court’s tentative ruling is not constitutionally justified,” he said. “Therefore, the state will appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court when the final order is issued.”

The court supported its argument by citing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s own support for prison reforms, which he has said would reduce the population by about 40,000 inmates."

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Massive Wind and Solar Installments Planned

"Germany Aims Big with a 960-Megawatt Offshore Wind Farm"

960 MW offshore wind farm located in the North Sea, being planned by RWE Innogy, a German company. There will be 250 turbines with 5-6 MW capacity each. The project will cost ~ $5.6 billion, span 56 square miles, will start in 2010 and be completed in 2015. This farm could possibly avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 per year.

"Biggest Solar Deal Ever Announced — We're Talking Gigawatts"

1,300 MW solar thermal installation ("concentrates the sun's rays to create steam in a boiler and spin a turbine"), covering 10,500 acres, located in the desert outside LA. The project is the result of a deal between the utility Southern California Edison and the company BrightSource.

"International Criminal Court to Issue Arrest Warrant for Sudan's Bashir"

Courtesy of the Washington Post.

"UNITED NATIONS, Feb. 11 -- The International Criminal Court's pretrial judges have decided to issue a warrant for the arrest of Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sudan's Darfur region, according to an official at the United Nations.

Bashir is the first sitting head of state to be charged by the Hague-based court with war crimes, and the first Arab leader to face the prospect of being tried for atrocities by an international tribunal. The decision, which was first reported Wednesday night on the New York Times' Web site, is expected to be announced within two weeks.

Sudan's U.N. ambassador, Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem Mohamad, said that the charges are politically motivated and that his government will never surrender Bashir for prosecution. "This means nothing to us. We are not going to be bothered by it at all," he said in an interview."

- Read the full article here.

----

The official warrant will be largely symbolic. While the indictment is certainly a welcomed one and long overdue, the ICC is a weak institution. The ICC issued arrest warrants for Ahmad Harun, former Minister of the Interior for Sudan, and Ali Kushayb, alleged leader of the Janjaweed militia, nearly two years ago, and these men have yet to be arrested and brought to trial.

You can see the status of those trials here.

As the state department press conference mentions below, the US has not signed on to the Rome Statute and therefore does not officially recognize the ICC.

Basically, we need Bashir, Harun, and Kushayb arrested, but the UN and the ICC are too weak to get the job done.

You can check the state department's comments on the matter here.

Oil Industry Executives Conciliatory on Global Warming, Debate Cap and Trade v. Carbon Tax

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/science/earth/12oil.html

At an oil industry conference in Houston this past weekend -

"On tackling global warming, a subject that has long divided the industry, some executives said they supported a tax on carbon, while others favored a trading system like the one adopted by Europe. Almost all of them seemed reconciled to the United States’ adopting some kind of climate policy, and said they were eager to work with the new administration to devise an effective energy strategy."

Why the sudden change?

"Daniel Yergin, the chairman of Cambridge Energy Research and the organizer of the conference, said oil companies recognized that major policy changes were coming, and that they need to be a part of the debate."

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

US was within 3 hours of complete economic and political collapse

The following is courtesy of Daily Kos;
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/9/234340/6189/142/695504

"
According to Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D) (PA-11), in mid-September of 2008, the United States of America came just three hours away from the collapse of the entire economy." - Daily Kos

Worldwide economic collapse would have occured within 24 hours thereafter.

The full transcript and video is available below. 2;10 is where transcript begins.



"I was there when the secretary and the chairman of the Federal Reserve came those days and talked to members of Congress about what was going on... Here's the facts. We don't even talk about these things.

On Thursday, at about 11 o'clock in the morning, the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the United States to a tune of $550 billion being drawn out in a matter of an hour or two.

The Treasury opened up its window to help. They pumped $105 billion into the system and quickly realized that they could not stem the tide. We were having an electronic run on the banks.

They decided to close the operation, close down the money accounts, and announce a guarantee of $250,000 per account so there wouldn't be further panic and there. And that's what actually happened.

If they had not done that their estimation was that by two o'clock that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the United States, would have collapsed the entire economy of the United States, and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed.

Now we talked at that time about what would have happened if that happened. It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it."



i do not understand this. but i should.